You are here

Comments & Requests

My Comment
Purchase Items
Information required for each item: Title and Author. ISBN/ISSN, Year, and Edition are optional.
Available Training
We offer one-on-one or group training sessions on many topics FREE for all Penn State Hershey affiliated users. Let us know what you need and we will work with you to design a customized, on-demand training session. We also can work with instructors to provide sessions for students.
Choose one or more topics*
Systematic Review Consultation Form

To know more about this service, check the Systematic Review page.

Step One

Decide what type of review is most appropriate for your topic. Systematic reviews are used to answer specific clinical questions. Do you have a clinical question that can be put into the PICO format? 

Patient/population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome

Many times research teams are looking for an overview of the existing literature and not answering a specific question. When this is the case a scoping review would be more appropriate. These reviews follow the process and standards are rigorous. They just have a different purpose.  Read A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies

Systematic Review Scoping Review
Focused research question with narrow parameters Research question(s) often broad
Inclusion/exclusion usually defined at outset Inclusion/exclusion can be developed post hoc
Quality filters often applied Quality not an initial priority
Detailed data extraction May or may not involve data extration
Quantitative synthesis often performed Synthesis more qualitative and typically not quantitative
Formally assess the quality of studies and generates a conclusion relating to the focused research question Used to identify parameters and gaps in a body of literature

‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review Journal of Public Health. Volume 33, Issue 1 p. 147-150

Fill in as much information as possible
PICO question if a systematic review
Criteria for considering studies for this review
Types of outcome measures
Additional Information
  • If you know the item that you need, did you use the Get It button in Pubmed, or use our journal list to find the full text? If you still cannot find the item, please submit an interlibrary loan request. If you still have questions, please submit them below.

The results of this search will not be comprehensive or exhaustive enough to serve as the basis of a systematic review or meta-analysis. If you need a systematic review search, please contact Amy Knehans to schedule a consultation.

Information About Your Topic - Required

Please call Research Help to alert staff.

(This information will help librarians better understand your information need. Press Ctrl to select multiple.)
Information About Your Topic - Optional
(Press Ctrl to select multiple.)
READ Poster Recognition Award Nomination
Description
This award, as judged by the Harrell Health Sciences Library READ Poster Recognition Award Committee, shall be given each year to 4-6 eligible recipients. Any member of the Penn State Hershey community, at any location, may submit a nomination. More information about the program and previous READ posters is available on the program website. Nominations may be submitted at any point during the year, but will next be reviewed for the upcoming cycle. Questions about the READ Poster Program and submitting nominations may be directed to Marie Cirelli.
Eligibility

Nominees may be any person affiliated with the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, or the Penn State College of Medicine, including faculty, staff, students, administrators, volunteers, alumni, donors and others, who meet one or more of the following criteria:

Over time honorees should be representative of all the different groups within the Penn State College of Medicine and Milton S. Hershey Medical Center.

Nominee